What have we learnt today?
It was a busy morning for MPs on the Business and Trade Committee, who questioned several key witnesses regarding the Post Office scandal.
Here are the key things we learnt:
Victims still suffering
We heard first from Dr Neil Hudgell, a lawyer for sub-postmasters, and champion of their cause Lord Arbuthnot.
They painted a grim picture - one in which the vast majority of victims had not received their compensation, not had their convictions overturned or simply not been engaged with by guilty parties.
We learnt that more than 200 new legal inquiries were raised to Dr Hudgell since the ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office was aired.
Victims' voice
Next up came the famous Alan Bates and fellow former sub-postmistress Jo Hamilton, who provided some insight into how the victims of this scandal have been affected.
Mr Bates said the Post Office had engineered a system in which it could effectively point a "financial gun" at the heads of sub-postmasters and mistresses.
Ms Hamilton said she had been "gaslit" by the Post Office into thinking she had committed offences.
"They convinced me that it was all my fault and I wasn't tech savvy at all," she told the committee.
Fujitsu 'sorry'
The head of Fujitsu's European operation began his time in front of the committee with an apology to those affected.
"Fujitsu would like to apologise for our part in this appalling miscarriage of justice," Paul Patterson, who was not at the company at the time of the scandal, said.
"We did have bugs and errors in the system and we did help the Post Office in their prosecutions of the sub-postmasters and for that we are truly sorry."
Bruising questioning for Post Office boss
Nick Read, head of the Post Office, had a rough afternoon in front of the committee.
Members repeatedly asked him about the timeline of events - but he said he was unable to answer many of the questions because he only joined the business in 2019.
This earned him the wrath of several members, including the chair.
"You must surely have had time in four years to cut to the heart of this issue," Liam Byrne said.
Labour MP Ian Lavery said: "If we're bringing people in front of the committee, we would expect them at least to have knowledge of the history of what's happened - [especially for] something as big as this - and I'm absolutely appalled at the answers which we've received."
Mr Read appeared frustrated throughout proceedings, often telling members of the committee he would have to come back to them with answers to their questions.
The chair then said in his closing statement that Mr Read's evidence, and that of Mr Patterson, had left the committee "fairly shocked".
Post Office minister says Horizon 'least worst option'
Kevin Hollinrake said little we haven't heard, but one takeaway is that the government has not set a deadline for compensating all the victims.
Mr Hollinrake said he wanted to see that process completed by August, but he emphasised: "It's not a deadline", rather "an ambition we want to deliver this scheme by".
He also described the Horizon system, which is still in place, as "the least worst option" for the Post Office's needs, adding that the government was helping to fund the move away from that system despite the mooted 拢270m cost.